October 29, 2010

Obama’s opportunity

Posted: Thu Oct 28 2010, 05:27 hrs
The last decade witnessed a remarkable transformation in US-India relations, initiated, supported and advanced by the leadership of both countries. I had the privilege of travelling with President Clinton in March 2000 for his five-day visit to India, a trip many observers consider the “turning point” in our new relationship. Now it will be President Obama’s opportunity to leave his mark on what has become a burgeoning strategic partnership, one that will surely be one of the most important, for both countries, in the 21st century.
During these past ten years the US and Indian governments have greatly expanded economic and commercial relations, agreed to an unprecedented accord on civilian nuclear cooperation, taken our military ties and defence trade to a new level, and launched new initiatives in energy and climate change, agriculture, science and technology development, space exploration, higher education and efforts to combat HIV-AIDS.
But there is even more we should do together.

With this goal in mind, and in advance of Obama’s visit to India, a bipartisan group of two dozen former US officials and experts, under the co-chairmanship of former Deputy Secretary of State Richard Armitage and Under-Secretary of State Nicholas Burns, recently completed an eight-month review of the main pillars of the US relationship and issued its report.

Entitled Natural Allies: A Blueprint for the Future of US-India Relations (with a nod of appreciation to former Prime Minister Atal Bihari Vajpayee for the phrase), the report contains a comprehensive set of recommendations based on the belief that a stronger and more prosperous India will allow for a more vibrant US-India relationship and that the US “should encourage and facilitate India’s rise as a full stakeholder in the international community.”
To accomplish India’s “full stakeholder” status, the first recommendation found in the report is perhaps its most important: “We believe that the United States should commit, publicly and explicitly, to work with India in support of its permanent membership in an enlarged UN Security Council.”
Neither the Clinton nor the Bush administration backed India’s bid for a permanent seat on the UN Security Council. The time is now ripe to do so. The current Security Council, with its five permanent members, is a vestige of the last century, the post-Second World War world. For the United Nations’ most important body to remain credible and legitimate for the 21st century, it must be reformed. And if the Security Council is to be enlarged to reflect the geopolitical realities of the 21st century, how could India not be a permanent member?

Among other key recommendations set forth in the report: the US should seek a broad expansion of trade and investment, beginning with a bilateral investment treaty; greatly expand the security relationship, including counter-terrorism cooperation; support India’s membership in key export control organisations such as the Nuclear Suppliers Group and the Missile Technology Control Regime, a step toward further integrating India into global nonproliferation efforts; and liberalise US export controls, thus permitting the increased export of high-technology US goods to India. This liberalisation should also result in the removal of subsidiaries of the Indian Space Research Organisation or ISRO from the US Entity List.

Finally, the working group called on the US and India to lift their “vision” about what our strategic partnership can accomplish — and offered one “Big Idea” for doing so. The two countries should launch a “Global Commons” initiative to protect and preserve access to the threatened common spaces of our planet — the seas, air, outer space and cyber realms. These realms will be critical to the security and prosperity of the world in the 21st century and the US and India should take the lead to “encourage all global powers to use the commons responsibly.”
Ten years ago in New Delhi, at the conclusion of their official meetings, President Clinton and Prime Minister Vajpayee issued a joint statement entitled India-US Relations: A Vision for the 21st Century. The first sentence read: “At the dawn of a new century, we resolve to create a closer and qualitatively new relationship between India and the United States.”
Their successors — George W. Bush and Barack Obama on the US side and Manmohan Singh on the India side — have certainly lived up to that charge, and more. But, as the Natural Allies: Blueprint report states, “this progress is not self-sustaining. It requires bold leadership to expand and deepen the US-India partnership in a spirit commensurate with its vital importance.”
The writer is a professor at the Elliott School of International Affairs at George Washington University and a former US assistant secretary of state for South Asia affairs, 1997-2001. He served on the US-India working group sponsored by the Centre for a New American Security

No comments: