January 10, 2019

Have a Coke and an uncomfortable smile about your obesity problem!

Supchina.com


Andrew Jacobs of the New York Times reports (porous paywall):

Happy 10 Minutes, a Chinese government campaign that encouraged schoolchildren to exercise for 10 minutes a day, would seem a laudable step toward improving public health in a nation struggling with alarming rates of childhood obesity.

But the initiative and other official Chinese efforts that emphasized exercise as the best way to lose weight were notable for what they didn’t mention: the importance of cutting back on the calorie-laden junk foods and sugary beverages that have become ubiquitous in the world’s second largest economy.

China’s fitness-is-best message, as it happens, has largely been the handiwork of Coca-Cola and other Western food and beverage giants, according to a pair of new studies that document how those companies have helped shape decades of Chinese science and public policy on obesity and diet-related illnesses like Type 2 diabetes and hypertension.

The findings, published Wednesday in The BMJ and The Journal of Public Health Policy, show how Coca-Cola and other multinational food companies, operating through a group called the International Life Sciences Institute, cultivated key Chinese officials in an effort to stave off the growing movement for food regulation and soda taxes that has been sweeping the West.


If you’re interested in this topic — to me, a fascinating one — listen to the BMJ podcast linked above (and here) and read the whole paper by Harvard anthropologist Susan Greenhalgh, who has uncovered a very seamy history of Coca-Cola influence operations in China aimed at hooking the nation on carbonated sugar water.

More on obesity in China: You can watch Fat China! Paul French talks about obesity in China, a (low-production value!) YouTube video interview I did with author Paul French on the roof of the Beijing Bookworm eight years ago. Paul focuses less on the evil acts of Western fast-food corporations, and puts more blame on the changing lifestyles of a growing urban middle class for the obesity epidemic.

There are some interesting details in the interview, such as a journalist getting in trouble for revealing that then Party secretary and president Hú Jǐntāo 胡锦涛 is a diabetic, and the possible business opportunities and political risks to the Party of lifestyle diseases.

January 09, 2019

Disinformation: 2018 in Figures

27 December 2018 | FOWNews and analysisTop Story

2018 has been a busy year for the pro-Kremlin disinformation campaign, with Russian trolls and media working hard to spread falsehoods on an ever-widening range of issues.

From U.S. elections to Crimea to the Skripal poisoning, here’s an overview in figures of how Russian influence operations sought to divide Western societies in 2018 and how a growing number of countries are hitting back.

This year, tech companies came under sustained pressure from Western governments for their role in enabling pro-Kremlin disinformation. The resulting disclosure of data by tech giants has provided new insights into the scale and impact of disinformation on social media.

A Good Year For The Trolls

Russian internet trolls, for example, appear to have thrived in 2018.

Based on information provided by Twitter, U.S. researchers were able to estimate that disinformation travels 6 times faster than truth on the platform.

No wonder considering that the Internet Research Agency, the troll factory based in St. Petersburg, moved to a sprawling new office of 12,000 square meters this year, up from their previous 4,000-square-meter workspace.

Russian trolls were also shown to receive 9 times more engagement in English than in Russian, reflecting the mounting Russian effort since 2013 to manipulate American voters.

The new data also revealed the magnitude of Russian online campaigns to influence election results in the United States and a number of European countries, although researchers often warned that the findings are likely the “tip of the iceberg.”

The U.S. Senate released a 206-page report detailing what it described as the Kremlin’s “lethal blend of conventional military assaults, assassinations, disinformation campaigns, cyberattacks” aimed at influencing the presidential election and U.S. politics in general.

Another set of reports produced for the Senate showed that Russian online influence operations began as early as 2013 and have actually intensified since Trump’s election.

Disinformation Topics: Something Old, Something New

In terms of narratives, the Russian disinformation campaign continued to focus heavily on eastern Ukraine and Crimea.

In Crimea, fake stories included the alleged construction by Ukrainian authorities of a 120-kilometre waterway aimed at isolating the annexed peninsula from mainland Ukraine.

In eastern Ukraine, Russian media falsely claimed that Ukrainian forces killed 10,000 people in areas controlled by pro-Russian separatists  and that 14 instructors had been dispatched by the U.S. secret services to help Kyiv poison water supplies in Donbas.

Russian media continued to push the narrative that Ukraine discriminates against Russian speakers, reporting for example that Ukraine doesn’t have a single Russian-language school when in fact it has 16.

NATO, MH17, and the alleged dangers of vaccination also remained pet topics for Russian trolls, media, and authorities.

The Russian foreign ministry accused Washington of failing to provide a single satellite image related the downing of flight MH17 over eastern Ukraine in 2014, although the United States had in fact publicly released images just five days after the tragedy.

As in previous years, Russian media actively sought to discredit NATO, falsely reporting for instance that 7 German pilots quit their country’s armed force in protest at a “NATO military campaign against Russia.”

As for vaccination, a whopping 93 percent of tweetson the issue come from malicious accounts.

2018 also brought Russian disinformation agents new topics to co-opt for their campaigns.

The poisoning of former Russian spy Sergei Skripal and his daughter on British soil, for example, generated a barrage of false claims and accusations. EUvsDisinfo recorded more than 20 different, at times conflicting narratives related to the attempted murder of the Skripals.

As previously, the impact of disinformation campaigns was difficult to assess, although journalists and pollsters did provide some indications.

Pervasive disinformation in Russian state media certainly appears to be bearing fruit with domestic audiences.

According to the country’s independent Levada polling centre, only 3 percent of Russians believe Moscow poisoned the Skripals and 46 percent of Russiansknow nothing about the Prague Spring events.

In Britain, even respected media outlets were fooled by pro-Kremlin disinformation.

An investigation by the Guardian showed that British media outlets had republished tweets from Russian trolls more than 100 times since 2017, including BuzzFeed, the Guardian, the Telegraph, the BBC, the Daily Mail, and the Daily Express.

Western Pushback

This year, growing awareness of pro-Kremlin disinformation has prompted a number of Western governments and organisations to fight back.

U.S authorities charged 13 Russian citizens for meddling in the 2016 presidential election, and several investigations into Russian influence operations in the United States are ongoing.

In France, parliament adopted a bill cracking down on the “manipulation of information” during election periods.

Under the draft law, initiated by President Emmanuel Macron, tech platforms that fail to disclose their funding sources for sponsored content will face one year in prison and a fine of 75,000 euros.

French government think tanks also issued 50 recommendations to fight disinformation, and Reporters Without Borders published its own 25 recommendations aimed at tackling online intimidation of journalists.

Also in 2018, Germany passed a tough new law slapping fines of up to 50 million euros on tech companies if they fail to remove within 24 hours posts containing hate speech or disinformation.

In Finland, a court slapped prison sentences and hefty fines on pro-Kremlin trolls for harassing journalist Jessikka Aro, making Finland the first European country to take legal action against Internet trolls.

In addition to providing governments with more data, tech companies also took steps to curb online influence campaigns on their platforms.

Facebook opened a “War Room” with 20 staffers to fight disinformation during election periods worldwide and doubled to 20,000 the number of staff monitoring content for disinformation.

And in May and June 2018 alone, Twitter suspended 70 million suspicious accounts.

So, who said figures never lie?