Skip to main content

Beijing loved Thomas Piketty’s critique of capitalism—until he turned to China

LOW MARX


French economist and academic Thomas Piketty
REUTERS/CHRISTIAN HARTMANN
Mary Hui
By Mary Hui

Reporter

Thomas Piketty’s Capital in the Twenty-First Century was a big hit in China, as 700-page tomes on economic theory go.  A few years after its publication, the French economist’s 2013 book got a shout-out (link in Chinese) from president Xi Jinping, who praised Piketty’s use of statistical evidence to showcase Western countries’ historic levels of inequality.

Piketty’s audacious follow-up, Capital and Ideology, is getting a much frostier reception. Published last year, the new book widens its scope to focus on inequality in places like India, Brazil, Russia, and China. Beijing did not appreciate the scrutiny. According to the South China Morning Post, Piketty’s Chinese publisher, Citic Press Group,  has demanded that all sections related to inequality in China be cut. “I refused these conditions, so at this stage it looks as if Capital and Ideology won’t be published in China,” Piketty told the SCMP.


The topic of inequality may be all the more sensitive these days as China recovers from the pandemic, which has disproportionately hit (paywall) its poor migrant workers and will likely widen the income gap between urban and rural populations.

In a tweet, Piketty said that it was “sad that [Chinese leader] Xi Jinping’s ‘socialism with Chinese characteristics’ shrinks itself from open discussion.”

In the book, Piketty draws on research he co-authored and published last year, and which uses tax data, surveys, and China’s national accounting statistics to estimate the growth of Chinese inequality from 1978 to 2015. He found that the share of the country’s wealth held by the top 10% of China’s population rose from 27% in the late 1970s to 41% by 2015, comparable to the levels of inequality seen in the US.


The book also criticizes the lack of detailed data on Chinese income tax, making it impossible to get a fully accurate picture of how the country’s gains in wealth have been distributed over the years. While a 2006 government order required high-income earners to file special declarations, the data was rudimentary and publication ceased in 2011. Piketty was able to scrape together regional data in subsequent years, but they were “irregular,” “inconsistent,” and “fragmentary.”

The criticism doesn’t stop there. If good income data is hard to come by, Piketty wrote, it’s even worse with data on wealth. There is no inheritance tax in China, and therefore no data on inheritances, making it exceedingly difficult to study wealth concentration. “It is truly paradoxical that a country led by a communist party, which proclaims its adherence to ‘socialism with Chinese characteristics,’ could make such a choice,” Piketty wrote.

It also means that China is, by one measure, the world’s best place to be a billionaire. As Piketty explains: ”So we find ourselves in the early twenty-first century in a highly paradoxical situation: an Asian billionaire who would like to pass on his fortune without paying any inheritance tax should move to Communist China.”

Which books China decides to censor, and which it allows on shelves, is full of contradictions, and censorship itself is a constantly shifting line. George Orwell’s 1984 and Animal Farm have been available for decades, though at least one school has removed the novels as part of a recent nationwide book-cleansing drive. Last year, China censored parts of Edward Snowden’s autobiography, but the former US intelligence employee found a way to get around the censors: posting the censored tracts on Twitter and crowdsourcing translations


https://qz.com/1897668/china-bans-pikettys-capitalism-and-ideology-over-inequality-data/


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Menon meets Karzai, discusses security of Indians

Kabul/New Delhi/Washington, March 5 (IANS) India Friday said that the Feb 26 terror attack in Kabul will not deter it from helping rebuild Afghanistan as National Security Adviser Shivshankar Menon met Afghan President Hamid Karzai in Kabul to review the security of around 4,000 Indians working in that country. Menon, who arrived here Friday morning on a two-day visit, discussed with Karzai some proposals to bolster security of Indians engaged in a wide array of reconstruction activities, ranging from building roads, bridges and power stations to social sector projects. The Indian government is contemplating a slew of steps to secure Indians in Afghanistan, including setting up protected venues where the Indians working on various reconstruction projects will be based. Deploying dedicated security personnel at places where Indians work is also being considered. Menon also met his Afghan counterpart Rangin Dadfar Spanta and enquired about the progress in the probe into the Kabul atta

Iran is losing the game to regional actors in its strategic depth

Rethink before It’s Too Late http://www.irdiplomacy.ir/index.php?Lang=en&Page=21&TypeId=15&ArticleId=7108&BranchId=19&Action=ArticleBodyView Iran is losing the game to regional actors in its strategic depth –Afghanistan. By Houman Dolati It is no more a surprise to see Iran absent in Afghanistan affairs. Nowadays, the Bonn Conference and Iran’s contributions to Afghanistan look more like a fading memory. Iran, which had promised of loans and credit worth five-hundred million dollars for Afghanistan, and tried to serve a key role, more than many other countries, for reconstruction and stabilization of Afghanistan, is now trying to efface that memory, saying it is a wrong path, even for the international community. Iran’s empty seat in the Rome Conference was another step backward for Afghanistan’s influential neighbor. Many other countries were surprised with Iran’s absence. Finding out the vanity of its efforts to justify absence in Rome, Iran tried to start its

Pakistani firm whose chemicals were used to kill US troops seeks subsidy for Indiana plant

By Jennifer Griffin, Justin Fishel Published March 22, 2013   A Pakistani fertilizer maker whose chemicals have been used in 80 percent of the roadside bombs that have killed and maimed American troops in Afghanistan is now seeking U.S. taxpayer subsidies in order to open a factory in Indiana.  The request appears to be on hold pending further review, but the situation has stirred outrage in Congress, where some accuse the Pakistani government of halting efforts to clamp down on the bomb-making.  For the past seven years, the U.S. government has known that the raw material calcium ammonium nitrate, or CAN, is making its way across the border into Afghanistan where the Taliban use it to fuel their most deadly weapons, namely the improvised explosive device. IEDs have long been the number one killer of U.S. and coalition troops.  The material largely comes from Pakistani fertilizer maker the Fatima Group. But the Pakistani government has stymied attempts by the Pentagon to stop the