Skip to main content

Debate over Thailand’s plan to 'scrap' Kra Canal is much ado about nothing



By IAN STOREY


UPDATED 10 SEPTEMBER, 2020

For those observers who closely follow the long-running saga of Thailand’s Kra canal, recent media reports will have come as no surprise.

The three-centuries old idea to cut a canal across the Isthmus of Kra in southern Thailand is unfailingly resurrected whenever the Thai economy hits the skids, as it has done since the onset of the Covid-19 pandemic.

Advocates of the canal (or other Kra transportation initiatives such as road, rail and oil pipelines) invariably argue that the project will create thousands of jobs and revitalise the country’s economic prospects.   

But this time the story has a slightly different twist: That the “cancellation” of the Kra canal project, and its replacement with a road and rail link, is not only a major set-back for China, but a strategic gain for India.

The Kra canal issue resurfaced at the end of August when Bloomberg published a story which quoted Thailand’s transport minister Saksiam Chidchob.

The minister trotted out the old argument that since the Straits of Malacca had become “quite congested”, an alternative route was needed to bypass one of the world’s busiest waterways.

Read also: Thailand’s Kra phoenix rises again

But instead of a canal — construction of which would have a catastrophic impact on the environment — Mr Chidchob revealed that the government had thrown its weight behind an alternative initiative: Building two deepwater ports on either side of the isthmus linked by a highway and railroad.

According to the minister, the government had earmarked US$5.3 million (S$7.25 million) for a feasibility study to examine the 100km “land bridge” idea.

The story quickly gained traction. American academic Salvatore Babones argued in an article in Foreign Policy that the Kra canal proposal was a part of China’s Belt and Road Initiative (BRI) and that it would fit “neatly into Beijing’s plans to encircle India”.

Read also: Thailand not backing Kra Canal project for now

India had responded, he noted, by beefing up its military presence in the Andaman and Nicobar Islands in the Bay of Bengal and “these have the potential to quarantine the proposed Thai canal”.

The article contained the usual tropes about the canal, including that its construction would undermine Singapore’s prosperity and hamper Bangkok’s counter-insurgency campaign in the Deep South as it would “split” the country in two.

Bizarrely, the Australia-based don went on to posit that should a future Thai government move to cut this “string” in China’s so-called “string of pearls”, Beijing might support an independence movement in the Deep South and seize control of the canal.

Read also: China can make India suffer 'severe' military losses - Global Times

Piggy backing on this story, the Indian media had a field day.

Without citing any sources, the TV channel WION declared that Thailand had “scrapped” the Kra canal plan and that, together with the Thai government’s decision to defer payment on two Chinese-manufactured submarines, this signalled that Beijing was “losing allies” in the Indo-Pacific region (even though Thailand is not a treaty ally of China).

Meanwhile the Hindustan Times reported that  the unbuilt waterway “would pose a risk to India’s long-term maritime security”, while The Economic Times noted New Delhi would welcome Bangkok’s decision to push back against China as the Kra canal “could be threat to its security interests in the Bay of Bengal”. 

India’s Twitterati re-tweeted these stories with unalloyed glee at China’s supposed strategic misfortunes.

Unfortunately the narrative suffers from two major flaws.

First, you cannot scrap a plan that was never been approved. Since seizing power in a military coup in 2014, Prime Minister Prayuth Chan-ocha has been ambivalent at best about a Kra canal.

In response to calls by a group of businessmen and retired generals to build the canal, Mr Prayuth said it was not a priority for the government and then fobbed them off by asking the national economic planning agency to examine their proposal.

Since then Mr Prayuth has been preoccupied by the March 2019 elections, holding a shaky coalition together and dealing with Covid-19.

The Kra canal has not even been on his radar.

Second, China has never officially promoted the Kra canal as a BRI project.

Moreover, even if China were interested in providing the estimated US$30 billion in funding to build the canal, it would be unlikely to find popular support in Thailand as the controversies surrounding the Chinese-built High Speed Rail link and submarines have shown.

If the “Thai canal” is to find widespread support it must be seen as being a wholly-owned Thai-initiative and not a Chinese one.

Mr Chidchob’s proposal itself is not new and makes little economic sense.

Unloading goods at one port, transporting them across the country by rail or road, and then uploading them at another port increases rather than reduces transportation costs.

In the early 2000s, a proposal to build an oil pipeline across the Kra Isthmus floundered because it too was economically unviable. Moreover, at a time of global economic crisis, the initiative is unlikely to find any potential investors.

So what explains the Indian reaction?

Writing in Foreign Policy about erroneous reports of a Chinese fighter aircraft being shot down by Taiwan — which also garnered a lot of attention in India — the magazine’s deputy editor James Palmer astutely noted that due to Sino-Indian border tensions, the Indian audience is “primed for news of both Chinese aggression and Chinese failure”. 

And, more importantly perhaps, why has the proposal for a Kra transportation system popped up again?

A cynic might note that at a time of economic stringency, a US$5.3 million feasibility study provides opportunities for expense claims and fact-finding missions to exotic locations. 

 

ABOUT THE AUTHOR:

Ian Storey is a senior fellow at the Iseas–Yusof Ishak Institute. This piece first appeared in Iseas Commentary

Read more at https://www.todayonline.com/commentary/debate-over-thailands-plan-scrap-kra-canal-much-ado-about-nothing

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Menon meets Karzai, discusses security of Indians

Kabul/New Delhi/Washington, March 5 (IANS) India Friday said that the Feb 26 terror attack in Kabul will not deter it from helping rebuild Afghanistan as National Security Adviser Shivshankar Menon met Afghan President Hamid Karzai in Kabul to review the security of around 4,000 Indians working in that country. Menon, who arrived here Friday morning on a two-day visit, discussed with Karzai some proposals to bolster security of Indians engaged in a wide array of reconstruction activities, ranging from building roads, bridges and power stations to social sector projects. The Indian government is contemplating a slew of steps to secure Indians in Afghanistan, including setting up protected venues where the Indians working on various reconstruction projects will be based. Deploying dedicated security personnel at places where Indians work is also being considered. Menon also met his Afghan counterpart Rangin Dadfar Spanta and enquired about the progress in the probe into the Kabul atta

Iran is losing the game to regional actors in its strategic depth

Rethink before It’s Too Late http://www.irdiplomacy.ir/index.php?Lang=en&Page=21&TypeId=15&ArticleId=7108&BranchId=19&Action=ArticleBodyView Iran is losing the game to regional actors in its strategic depth –Afghanistan. By Houman Dolati It is no more a surprise to see Iran absent in Afghanistan affairs. Nowadays, the Bonn Conference and Iran’s contributions to Afghanistan look more like a fading memory. Iran, which had promised of loans and credit worth five-hundred million dollars for Afghanistan, and tried to serve a key role, more than many other countries, for reconstruction and stabilization of Afghanistan, is now trying to efface that memory, saying it is a wrong path, even for the international community. Iran’s empty seat in the Rome Conference was another step backward for Afghanistan’s influential neighbor. Many other countries were surprised with Iran’s absence. Finding out the vanity of its efforts to justify absence in Rome, Iran tried to start its

Pakistani firm whose chemicals were used to kill US troops seeks subsidy for Indiana plant

By Jennifer Griffin, Justin Fishel Published March 22, 2013   A Pakistani fertilizer maker whose chemicals have been used in 80 percent of the roadside bombs that have killed and maimed American troops in Afghanistan is now seeking U.S. taxpayer subsidies in order to open a factory in Indiana.  The request appears to be on hold pending further review, but the situation has stirred outrage in Congress, where some accuse the Pakistani government of halting efforts to clamp down on the bomb-making.  For the past seven years, the U.S. government has known that the raw material calcium ammonium nitrate, or CAN, is making its way across the border into Afghanistan where the Taliban use it to fuel their most deadly weapons, namely the improvised explosive device. IEDs have long been the number one killer of U.S. and coalition troops.  The material largely comes from Pakistani fertilizer maker the Fatima Group. But the Pakistani government has stymied attempts by the Pentagon to stop the