Skip to main content

Towards a "Principles First Approach" in Europe's China Policy

Drawing lessons from the Covid-19 crisis

Edited by Mikko Huotari, Jan Weidenfeld and Claudia Wessling

2020 was meant to be the year in which decisive progress was made in EU-China relations. It all came different: The coronavirus pandemic has exposed growing tensions in EU-China relations and served as a wake-up call for European decision makers and wider publics of their deep interdependence with China and of the resulting vulnerabilities. At the same time, China’s National Security Law in Hong Kong and human rights violations in Xinjiang have further increased tensions. 

MERICS' analysts have made the ongoing shifts in EU China policy the focus of the the latest MERICS Paper on China "Towards a ‘principles first approach’ in Europe China policy – Drawing lessons from the Covid-19 crisis”. They conclude, among others, that current developments in EU China relations are a culmination of trends that have been visible for some time: “Disillusionment with China has been growing across Europe for years, as policy makers and negotiators have found it increasingly difficult to find common ground with Chinese counterparts.”  

You can read this MERICS Paper on China online below or download  a PDF version here:

Introduction: Pursuing a principles-first approach in EU China policy (Mikko Huotari and Jan Weidenfeld)

European China policy needs to be grounded in a sober recognition of China’s frequent and sustained non-convergence with principles, values and best practices that underpin the European project and liberal-democratic market economies in the OECD world. Effective EU China policy will require swifter and more decisive leadership, and the creation of ad-hoc coalitions that are able to advance decisions quickly. Read more

Key graphics: Mapping EU-China interdependencies

The EU, its member states and China entertain close relations on different levels of politics, the economy and society. Explore our graphics chapter to learn more about EU-China relations, economic interdependencies and risky interconnectedness. Read more


Chapter 1: Protecting the EU’s political sovereignty and unity (Lucrezia Poggetti)

The Chinese party state is firmly intent on shaping public opinion and decision making in the EU. Critical challenges for Europe include the spread of Chinese propaganda and disinformation in Europe, the capture of elites who act as opinion shapers within European society, and self-censorship by those who shape European public perceptions of China. Read more

Chapter 2: Safe interdependence: Managing economic vulnerabilities (Caroline Meinhardt)

The supply chain disruptions caused by Covid-19 and the severity of their impact on Europeans’ health and livelihood have heightened existing concerns about Europe’s economic dependence on China. At the same time, China is increasingly leveraging its importance as a supplier of sought-after goods for economic coercion by means of threats and retaliation. Europe therefore has to systematically reassess its interdependencies. Read more


Chapter 3: Competing with China in the digital age (Rebecca Arcesati)

For Europe, economic competition with China is increasingly playing out in the digital domain and new technologies. Policymakers have begun to address China’s drive towards self-reliance and global leadership in key technologies. Going forward they will have to integrate previously marginal issues, such as the use of foreign research collaboration as an industrial policy tool and China’s standardization strategy for ICT and emerging technologies. Read more

Chapter 4: Advancing liberal multilateralism (Mikko Huotari and Katja Drinhausen)

Liberal multilateralism will not survive 2020 unscathed –a key reason being China’s corrosive impact. Despite Beijing’s claims to be a standard-bearer for global multilateralism, China’s actual approach is likely to clash more frequently and in more fundamental ways with OECD principles and European interests. Beijing might recognize multilateral forums as valuable tools, but it does not accept the validity of universal rules and principles imposed on nations. Read more


Chapter 5: Delivering Global Public Goods (Nis Grünberg and Thomas des Garets Geddes)

The EU will increasingly find that China is eager to shape the provision of Global Public Goods (GPGs). As the largest emitter of CO2, Beijing needs to take on bigger responsibilities in global climate action. On questions of global health and climate, cooperation with China will, however, be hampered and frustrating given growing distrust in other arenas, shifting domestic priorities, global power politics and political differences. Read more

Chapter 6: Engaging in effective geopolitical competition (Helena Legarda)

The coronavirus pandemic has provided Beijing with an opportunity to further expose and exploit vulnerabilities in the already strained Western-dominated global order. In the upcoming years, China will pose challenges to Europe in the Western Balkans and the MENA region, the Indo-Pacific, and increasingly in the Arctic. The EU must limit China’s geopolitical drive where necessary and contain it where possible while seizing opportunities that shape Chinese behavior. Read more

Editorial team: Claudia Wessling, Director Publications, MERICS, Janet Anderson, Freelance editor
Graphics: Alexandra Hinrichs, Graphic designer, MERICS
Header illustration: Anton Ohlow



Popular posts from this blog

Menon meets Karzai, discusses security of Indians

Kabul/New Delhi/Washington, March 5 (IANS) India Friday said that the Feb 26 terror attack in Kabul will not deter it from helping rebuild Afghanistan as National Security Adviser Shivshankar Menon met Afghan President Hamid Karzai in Kabul to review the security of around 4,000 Indians working in that country. Menon, who arrived here Friday morning on a two-day visit, discussed with Karzai some proposals to bolster security of Indians engaged in a wide array of reconstruction activities, ranging from building roads, bridges and power stations to social sector projects. The Indian government is contemplating a slew of steps to secure Indians in Afghanistan, including setting up protected venues where the Indians working on various reconstruction projects will be based. Deploying dedicated security personnel at places where Indians work is also being considered. Menon also met his Afghan counterpart Rangin Dadfar Spanta and enquired about the progress in the probe into the Kabul atta

Iran is losing the game to regional actors in its strategic depth

Rethink before It’s Too Late Iran is losing the game to regional actors in its strategic depth –Afghanistan. By Houman Dolati It is no more a surprise to see Iran absent in Afghanistan affairs. Nowadays, the Bonn Conference and Iran’s contributions to Afghanistan look more like a fading memory. Iran, which had promised of loans and credit worth five-hundred million dollars for Afghanistan, and tried to serve a key role, more than many other countries, for reconstruction and stabilization of Afghanistan, is now trying to efface that memory, saying it is a wrong path, even for the international community. Iran’s empty seat in the Rome Conference was another step backward for Afghanistan’s influential neighbor. Many other countries were surprised with Iran’s absence. Finding out the vanity of its efforts to justify absence in Rome, Iran tried to start its

Pakistani firm whose chemicals were used to kill US troops seeks subsidy for Indiana plant

By Jennifer Griffin, Justin Fishel Published March 22, 2013   A Pakistani fertilizer maker whose chemicals have been used in 80 percent of the roadside bombs that have killed and maimed American troops in Afghanistan is now seeking U.S. taxpayer subsidies in order to open a factory in Indiana.  The request appears to be on hold pending further review, but the situation has stirred outrage in Congress, where some accuse the Pakistani government of halting efforts to clamp down on the bomb-making.  For the past seven years, the U.S. government has known that the raw material calcium ammonium nitrate, or CAN, is making its way across the border into Afghanistan where the Taliban use it to fuel their most deadly weapons, namely the improvised explosive device. IEDs have long been the number one killer of U.S. and coalition troops.  The material largely comes from Pakistani fertilizer maker the Fatima Group. But the Pakistani government has stymied attempts by the Pentagon to stop the