Skip to main content

Balochistan: When it comes to the solution, the problem is restated

the writer is a senior political economist based in islamabad he can be reached at perveztahir yahoo com

The writer is a senior political economist based in Islamabad. He can be reached at

No prefix. No suffix. Mention Balochistan and everybody and their uncle knows what the problem is. When it comes to the solution, the problem is restated. The latest on offer is from the top man in authority, or so he likes to believe. He lost a Baloch ally for making little headway on its six demands. As framed, the Baloch are angry. Before that, it was lack of development. The federal government would announce special development packages with great fanfare with the objective of mainstreaming Balochistan. Not many in other provinces feel any mainstreaming, nor an ordinary Baloch vouchsafes development. According to the Pakistan Social and Living Standards Measurements survey, 2019-20, the average score of districts in Balochistan in education, health, information communications and technology, and living standard is far behind the other provinces. Until 1955, Balochistan was governed as the British did — central government in ex-British Balochistan and the semi-autonomous princely states. From 1955 to 1970, there was a total loss of identity under one unit. The people in other provinces knew Sui gas from Balochistan, without knowing that Sui in Balochistan had none of it. What the official website of Balochistan says in the context of the British has not changed even long after their departure. “The defense orientation of the administration precluded development and educational outlays.” Actually, this “orientation” has magnified since the killing of Nawab Akbar Bugti.

Has lack of development caused anger? Does that require an anger alleviation programme? Just as a poverty alleviation programme never aims at reducing poverty, much less eliminating it, the announcement of the anger alleviation programme has brought in its wake various interpretations of anger. Is it foreign-based, RAW-inspired local, local but disgruntled? A special assistant has been appointed, like there is one for poverty alleviation. The choice of a barely angry person has fuelled more anger.

The problem is more political than economic. After 1947, the most empowering moment for Balochistan was its emergence as a province in 1970. Pakistan’s only fair elections in the same year threw up leadership that eventually formed the government. This government was arbitrarily dismissed, opening the doors for engineers, with development funding as the key instrument. Two major initiatives made no difference. The 18th Amendment gave the province some control over its natural resources. Under the 7th National Finance Commission (NFC) Award, area was recognised as one of the criteria to distribute the divisible pool, besides relating Balochistan’s share to projections rather than actual collections, which are usually lower. The attitude to the China-Pakistan Economic Corridor (CPEC) explains it all. We were not consulted, is the complaint. To many, CPEC reminds the days of the Raj when the roads and railways were built for strategic purposes, with no local involvement. Rather than learning to respect the will of the people, the only lesson that seems to have been learnt from the East Pakistan debacle is to maintain massive and visible military presence to prevent secessionist tendencies. It was destined to fail. Hence another attempt to reach out to the angry Baloch.

Forget the anger. Just let Balochistan be a province like any other. Make arrangements for a fair and free election of the provincial assembly in 2023. In the run up, declare a general amnesty to allow all parties a fair chance. The military footprint should be reduced and confined to cantonments. Let the government be formed without any interference. This will permit the people of Balochistan to negotiate among themselves the rules of engagement with different ethnicities, mode of governance and resource allocation. Development packages and anger alleviation exercises have failed. Don’t let anger turn into hostility.

Published in The Express Tribune, July 16th, 2021.


Popular posts from this blog

Menon meets Karzai, discusses security of Indians

Kabul/New Delhi/Washington, March 5 (IANS) India Friday said that the Feb 26 terror attack in Kabul will not deter it from helping rebuild Afghanistan as National Security Adviser Shivshankar Menon met Afghan President Hamid Karzai in Kabul to review the security of around 4,000 Indians working in that country. Menon, who arrived here Friday morning on a two-day visit, discussed with Karzai some proposals to bolster security of Indians engaged in a wide array of reconstruction activities, ranging from building roads, bridges and power stations to social sector projects. The Indian government is contemplating a slew of steps to secure Indians in Afghanistan, including setting up protected venues where the Indians working on various reconstruction projects will be based. Deploying dedicated security personnel at places where Indians work is also being considered. Menon also met his Afghan counterpart Rangin Dadfar Spanta and enquired about the progress in the probe into the Kabul atta

Iran is losing the game to regional actors in its strategic depth

Rethink before It’s Too Late Iran is losing the game to regional actors in its strategic depth –Afghanistan. By Houman Dolati It is no more a surprise to see Iran absent in Afghanistan affairs. Nowadays, the Bonn Conference and Iran’s contributions to Afghanistan look more like a fading memory. Iran, which had promised of loans and credit worth five-hundred million dollars for Afghanistan, and tried to serve a key role, more than many other countries, for reconstruction and stabilization of Afghanistan, is now trying to efface that memory, saying it is a wrong path, even for the international community. Iran’s empty seat in the Rome Conference was another step backward for Afghanistan’s influential neighbor. Many other countries were surprised with Iran’s absence. Finding out the vanity of its efforts to justify absence in Rome, Iran tried to start its

Pakistani firm whose chemicals were used to kill US troops seeks subsidy for Indiana plant

By Jennifer Griffin, Justin Fishel Published March 22, 2013   A Pakistani fertilizer maker whose chemicals have been used in 80 percent of the roadside bombs that have killed and maimed American troops in Afghanistan is now seeking U.S. taxpayer subsidies in order to open a factory in Indiana.  The request appears to be on hold pending further review, but the situation has stirred outrage in Congress, where some accuse the Pakistani government of halting efforts to clamp down on the bomb-making.  For the past seven years, the U.S. government has known that the raw material calcium ammonium nitrate, or CAN, is making its way across the border into Afghanistan where the Taliban use it to fuel their most deadly weapons, namely the improvised explosive device. IEDs have long been the number one killer of U.S. and coalition troops.  The material largely comes from Pakistani fertilizer maker the Fatima Group. But the Pakistani government has stymied attempts by the Pentagon to stop the