Skip to main content

Baluch nationalism is not the ambition of the few


It is wrong to perceive that the Baluch nationalism is the ambition of the few. Pakistan perceive the Baluch struggle in Baluchistan, a) as relic of outmoded traditionalism, doomed to be overtaken by the unwelcome incursions of modernity, b) traditional immovable Sardars obstacle to modernization.

The Baluch tribes have had traditional rivalries among themselves. The Baluch tribes have had encountered each other during the colonial rule. They have been encountering each other during the Pakistan and Iranian colonial rules. Tribal movement always perceived as created and instigated to action by special interests that time and again masked for class privilege.

The very elites who were thought to be leading the people struggle have tribal commitment. The people who were to be leading their people away from tribal affiliations were found to be in the forefront of tribal conflicts. Lack of contemporary utility and onslaught of modern forces make traditionalism survival impossible. The tribal anarchism would lead the nation to the verge of disappearance.

Educated elites, city dwellers, detribalized sector of society were supposed to be leading the Pakistan’s modernization in Baluchistan, were found to be in the forefront of Baluch national struggle for independent Baluchistan. The Baluch national struggle has its deepest roots among educated elite. Ethnic conflict has extended up in urban areas.

The strength of national affiliations among the Baluch and the will of many Baluch who are willing to hold tight to nation values, heritages and right to re-establish the independent Baluchistan, make it impossible to suggest that the Baluch struggle for independent coming to an end.

Pakistan’s and Iranian have dismissed the Baluch nationalism as an artificial, they claims that it has been founded by their respective enemies , but contrary to their dismissal the Baluch national conflict with Persian is reflect on the ancient hostility and bitterness and the hostility toward Pakistan also deep rooted. The national hostilities are of long duration. Memories of recent past genocide by the Pakistan’s armed forces and recent humiliation inflicted collectively upon the Baluch nation will revive and sustain the contemporary condition for national struggle.

Emergence of the Baluch nationalism is a product of social mobilization. Shepherds and peasants which have been uprooted from their traditional villages have moved to the urban areas. Shortages of state resources and rates of social mobilization of the villagers to the urban areas, competition for urban modern resources hostilities against unassimilated new comer by the urban dweller insecurities of the changes derives the Baluch masses to the communal shelter of Nationalism.

The Baluch nation continued to be united because of their capacity to satisfy the demands of their members for the sets of goals. To the degree as the leaders provide benefits to their members, they are able to gain their support and achieve their loyalty.

The Baluch aspirations and expectations have changed; they are no longer mobilized into the tribal loyalties. They are mobilized into the modern economic. The Baluch demands more power, more goods, more recognition.

The Baluch want the same thing as Pakistan and Iran want that is sovereignty over Baluchistan territory, these conflicts will not end here and now. The Baluch nationalism is not resistant to the changes but a part of process of modernity.

It is wrong to perceive that the Baluch nationalism is the ambition of the few. The modern middle class should play the detribalizing roles; by further their interest by invoking support for these who are struggling for national liberation. The Baluch elites and middle classes have unique interest that related to the benefits of modernity.

The Baluch elites and middle classes has to realize that Pakistan and Iran (to less extent) failed to created a single language and culture for respective state and assimilate the rest of population into that culture and language, and divide the population of given state into the stratum. People preserve their identity, that identity give them sense of security, they persist their language because of their capacity to extract goods from it and satisfy their demands, and ethnicity is the collective will to exist. The Baluch has been excluded from the process of modernization by Pakistan for last 62 years and Iran for less than century but Baluch do not ceased to exist.

The smallest nation on the earth will never know of their members, but in their minds of each of them lives the image of their community. The nations are sovereign because enlightenment and revolution has destroyed the legitimacy of religious, hierarchical dynastic sphere. Nation is conceived as comradeship. Up to now there have been shortages of imagination.


Popular posts from this blog

Menon meets Karzai, discusses security of Indians

Kabul/New Delhi/Washington, March 5 (IANS) India Friday said that the Feb 26 terror attack in Kabul will not deter it from helping rebuild Afghanistan as National Security Adviser Shivshankar Menon met Afghan President Hamid Karzai in Kabul to review the security of around 4,000 Indians working in that country. Menon, who arrived here Friday morning on a two-day visit, discussed with Karzai some proposals to bolster security of Indians engaged in a wide array of reconstruction activities, ranging from building roads, bridges and power stations to social sector projects. The Indian government is contemplating a slew of steps to secure Indians in Afghanistan, including setting up protected venues where the Indians working on various reconstruction projects will be based. Deploying dedicated security personnel at places where Indians work is also being considered. Menon also met his Afghan counterpart Rangin Dadfar Spanta and enquired about the progress in the probe into the Kabul atta

Pakistani firm whose chemicals were used to kill US troops seeks subsidy for Indiana plant

By Jennifer Griffin, Justin Fishel Published March 22, 2013   A Pakistani fertilizer maker whose chemicals have been used in 80 percent of the roadside bombs that have killed and maimed American troops in Afghanistan is now seeking U.S. taxpayer subsidies in order to open a factory in Indiana.  The request appears to be on hold pending further review, but the situation has stirred outrage in Congress, where some accuse the Pakistani government of halting efforts to clamp down on the bomb-making.  For the past seven years, the U.S. government has known that the raw material calcium ammonium nitrate, or CAN, is making its way across the border into Afghanistan where the Taliban use it to fuel their most deadly weapons, namely the improvised explosive device. IEDs have long been the number one killer of U.S. and coalition troops.  The material largely comes from Pakistani fertilizer maker the Fatima Group. But the Pakistani government has stymied attempts by the Pentagon to stop the

From Khartoum to Cairo - by Dr. Issam El Zein El Mahi Last month the Ambassador of Egypt in Sudan, Abdel Moneim Shazali, made two appearances in Sudan; one was at the Rashid Center For Arts, where he made a overall comment on the issue of the Nile water, and the second was a lecture arranged by the International Center for African Studies (established by Libya in Khartoum), where he was able to meet with Sudanese thinkers and journalists. Two major points were raised in these lectures. The first was the usual statement that the relationship between the two countries was eternal. This was not accepted by some who said that the eternality is between the two people but not with the Egyptian government. The other was the question of the Halaib Triangle, which is silently occupied by Egypt while Sudan does not compromise its right on that piece of land, but also does not see that the time is suitable to open such a file at the moment. 50 years on and still not resolved The que